General Forums >> HRGuru Polls >> Poll: What is the best way to motivate employees?
Poll: What is the best way to motivate employees?
Poll: What is the best way to motivate employees?
|
34 posts back to top |
Posted 10 months ago In your opinion, what is the best way to motivate employees? |
|
1 post back to top |
| Posted 10 months ago Dear
We can motivate the employees by providing them ontime services from Hr Dept.And accounts Dept.Regarding their salary and benefits and rewards only. Now adays simply saying you have done a nice job will never motivate the employees.
UDAY |
|
1 post back to top |
| Posted 10 months ago gettting paid on time is always important...also what about asking employees for input on upcoming company changes; incorporating employee goals with company goals; redesigning jobs to add some tasks that allow empoyees want to grow OR give employees a little more involvement in the whole process, etc. |
|
9 posts back to top |
| Posted 10 months ago The most common response is monetary compensation (e.g., pay raise). However, not everyone is motivated by money alone. Recognition is an important factor as well. I recommend an Employee of the Month/Quarter/Year or letter of appreciation. Providing the option to cross-train in another department will defer some of the monotony. Plus, the orgranization has provided the employee the opportunity to be more of an asset by "filling in" whenever there is a staff shortage in a department other than their primary position. Giving employees additional time off for a job well done is an excellent motivator as well.
|
|
5 posts back to top |
| Posted 10 months ago I chose additional time off as my answer because I work with a large 'Generation Y' group who are always looking for that work-life balance. They feel that pay is and entitlement so that doesn't motivate them. We work in such a different time now it's so amazing. Decades ago pay would have been the top motivator but now we are seeing many other types of things like recognition and benefits. |
|
16 posts back to top |
| Posted 10 months ago The most commonly way to motivate an employee is better pay, when i say better pay it should be based on competency and the responsibilties assisgned to a person to perform a job better and better. Other than this i can think of challenges to excel and grown with in the organisation via creating a job opputunity with in the organisation. |
|
8 posts back to top |
| Posted 9 months ago I say better benefits. As long as a company is competitive in its pay, ample benefits make the biggest difference in corporate culture. Having a positive and progressive corporate culture will attract the best talent and reduce turnover, such as offering benefits like flexible work schedules, telecommuting options (one day per week), tuition reimbursement, 401k matching, company sponsored events (like skiing trips at a discounted rate), game nights (with food provided), and other benefits such as recruiting referral bonuses, suggestion boxes, and performance awards and recognition. The more fun the environment, the more recognition and rewards, and the more employees feel they have a voice, the better perceived “benefits” the company provides to its employees. In the long-term, these, along with competitive pay, attract and retain top talent much more effectively than good pay alone.
|
|
2 posts back to top |
| Posted 9 months ago shillphr says ... "....I work with a large 'Generation Y' group who are always looking for that work-life balance. They feel that pay is and entitlement so that doesn't motivate them." Agreed, and it's increasingly important for this boomer. Mind you I'm used to 30 days leave (I'm a Brit) so I'll always vote for more time off. Interestingly, many of us from the other side of the pond also consider leave as entitlement. I guess if more leave becomes the norm eventually this will also be viewed as an entitlement. Thing is, we need to understand what motivates a very diverse work force and providing a flexible benefits package (including the option to choose extra vacation) might well help us achieve this. |
|
Account Removed 0 posts back to top |
| Posted 9 months ago I voted for extra vacation because of the work-life balance that people are trying to achieve these days. More paid time off so that they can spend time with their families without having to lose money would be a real incentive. |
|
42 posts back to top |
| Posted 9 months ago Listen to their current priorities and desires, (as individuals) and see what you (and the organization) can do to satisfy their needs and wants. A. may be looking for recognition, B. may be looking for more interesting work, C. may want better tools, D. might be looking for a chance for personal growth while E. may need more flexible working hours. Ric - orglearn |
|
2 posts back to top |
| Posted 9 months ago The thing is that in the current economic climate the development/enhancement of benefits will have a reduced focus. |
|
261 posts back to top |
| Posted 9 months ago In my country it is more pay that motivates the employees . |
|
Account Removed 0 posts back to top |
| Posted 9 months ago More pay is just a short term motivator. But it is different strokes for different folks. If given a choice for more pay or more vacation, I would take more vacation. |
|
42 posts back to top |
| Posted 9 months ago Actually the prospect of more pay/money may inspire employees to greater levels of activity however once they get it 'they always deserved it'. Lack of 'proper levels' of pay, or the perception by an employee that he or she is underpaid can however lead to demotivation. I don't, after working and employing people in a number of countries over forty years, believe that money is a motivator. In Asia many people swap jobs straight after annual bonus time... where's the value in that? ric - orglearn |
|
2 posts back to top |
| Posted 9 months ago As a manager for Sears, I was taught that money can only motivate workers so far before they begin to see it as a bribe. So we were taught to get to know our workers. Some people crave attention, so you use simple awards given in front of co-workers. Some need time off because of family needs - young children or caring for parents, etc. But in today's market, I think it would behoove us all to have better benefit packages. Health, vision or dental care are not always affordable to the lower wage earners. So maybe compensation to cover premiums for a better benefit package for the coming enrollment period could be a great incentive. You just have to get to know the individuals and know their mindset - know what makes them tick or what ticks them off! cheryl5215 |
|
86 posts back to top |
| Posted 9 months ago I found it hard to choose. Since I am pretty pleased with my benefits and I have more vacation time than I can honestly take in a year and know that pay by itself is not enough of a stimulant, I could not select any of the options listed. It make me think though about someone who comes to work every day and for whatever reason simply feels disconnected and hence, unmotivated. Better pay, benefits, and vacation are good incentives but do not seem to give an "unmotivated" person the push to do more. I think the comment about recognition and knowing that what you do makes a difference for the team and organization provides great impetus. Motivation comes from within - having someone tell you, "gee, your work on XXX was very insightful and I appreciated your work" is meaningul to stretch oneself. I agree that work-life balance is important and we should strive for it on a daily basis. I would like to see the concept of recognition added as a choice. |
|
1 post back to top |
| Posted 9 months ago
I love Hertzberg’s model and don’t feel that it has dated over the years. I think that all of the above the motivators still apply whilst the hygiene factors such as pay can often serve as a demotivator especially when they are changed in some way or don’t match up to their colleagues. I also believe that organisations that have an effective people strategy and implement it effectively rather than let it gather dust in a bottom drawer will have greater motivation and employee engagement. |
|
105 posts back to top |
| Posted 9 months ago I also found it hard to choose between just those three things. I think that motivation is something that is unique to each individual but that there is one major component in an organization that will help the road to motivating employees--COMMUNICATION. When employees feel as though they are active participants in an organization rather than numbers on the payroll, it tends to make them have some personal ownership of their own motivation. When employees know the direction of the future and can feel somewhat safe (in knowing there's no impending layoff, etc.) then they can focus on work and not the "what if's" of the company. |
|
86 posts back to top |
| Posted 9 months ago I am glad to hear I have company. Absolutely, communication is a key ingredient and I thought the idea of having personal ownership powerful. I hear you saying that having a greater knowledge based of the company's direction helps. I recall participating in what we called "a visioning planning day". It was a great forum for "newbies" and employees learned about the direction of the company and input was encouraged. Has anyone else had this experience? If you have, what did you think of it? Any ideas out there..... |
|
105 posts back to top |
| Posted 9 months ago My last company held quarterly employee forums for all employees. The CEO delivered a presentation (prepared by the forum team which I chaired) and encouraged input. This helped to include employees in with what was going on, address rumors, and even helped initiate some change that was long overdue in some areas. It was a nice environment where the employees felt relatively free from retaliation or any such intimidation. If the CEO could not deliver the presentation, one of the other senior staff members would present it. Each forum offered the opportunity for employees to complete a brief survey and the comments initially were VERY eye-opening to what the employees wanted. We thought we knew what the employees wanted but it turned out that they simply wanted to be included in the communication loop BEFORE things were made final. The impact of having their opinions VALUED for a change was immeasurable. The forums were structured and heated discussions were moderated so that the CEO could personally address after the forum directly with the employees--not in a retalitory manner but just a fact finding mission. When people began to realize that the CEO cared about the organization as much as he did, attitudes began to shift from negative, derogatory remarks, etc. to a more positive, team oriented, "we can do it" attitude. We celebrated the wins during these forums as well as communicated some of the losses (learning opportunities) and it was AWESOME. The thing is, however, if you're going to roll this kind of program out you must be committed to keeping it going because employees come to expect them. |
|
6 posts back to top |
| Posted 9 months ago Among the choices given, I chose better benefits to be the best way to motivate employees. Higher salaries tend to increase tax payments and other state legislated deductions which does not really give a substantial increase in the take home pay of the employees. More vacation time gives the employee a holiday hang over that decrease productivity. However, without those choices, I personally believe that finding out what demotivates the employees and working up from there is the best way to motivate the employees. There are many reasons and factors within the working environment that contributes to the demotivation of an employee, among them are the seeming lack of concern for their welfare, a hostile environment, family problems, lack of understanding of the job, unapproachable boss, etc. Awareness and understanding of the needs of the employees with regards to the performance of their duties and responsibilities is a positive step in motivating the employees for better productivity. |
|
5 posts back to top |
| Posted 9 months ago more pay, better facilities and extra vacations all will motivate but for short period. Actual motivatioan is recognition as important member of the organisation and acceptance as a contributor to the success of the organisation. |
|
1 post back to top |
| Posted 9 months ago Just a few other considerations. Regular notification of company updates, so that they feel involved with 'their' company. If possible have team meeting at least once every two weeks by line managers. Praising employees on front of other staff members for a job well done. A structured training programme. Setting realistic objectivies. An open door policy for all ideas, suggestions. Employee reward schemes where employees make a suggestion on how a company can save money, e.g. better energy efficiency. They receive a percentage of the saving. Everybody wins, plus it can motivate other employees to be more creative. |
|
79 posts back to top |
| Posted 9 months ago I will vote for better benefits. Appying the Maslow's hirerarchy of human needs, money will motivate people for short term as long as they are in the basic neeeds phase. Those who are seeking social recognition or self esteem have other needs. What is important in people / employee motivation is to have diversified approaches that fit into individual needs. |
|
2 posts back to top |
| Posted 8 months ago It is a regular topic but not easy to hit the mark. However, to make staff understand the company's merit strategy through coaching is really essential to successfully motivate employee no matter what kind of method HR will use. The merit strategy is related to the business life-cycle, market trend, and also the cash flow situation etc. |
|
34 posts back to top |
| Posted 8 months ago Varied thoughts put in, i would pretty much agree with what david and ric have to say - its always " different strokes for different folks". Our company - an billion dollar IT major, took a different path this year to understand how motivated our employees are. We had conducted a survey to guage how " engaged " our employees were more than how " satisfied" they were. The thought stemmed from - Gallup's Q12 ( http://www.artsusa.org/pdf/events/2005/conv/gallup_q12.pdf ) |
|
97 posts back to top |
| Posted 8 months ago I like Maslow and Hertzberg, however I'm a huge fan of the Job Characteristics Theory of Motivation simply due to the similarity with employee engagement it has. I think Maslow and Hertzberg were excellent foundations, and current research seems to be gaining some momentum. I think there is another thread similar to this one, has some excellent conversation on this. |
|
4 posts back to top |
| Posted 8 months ago I would go with benefits...I think its more to do with work culture....employer's need to nurture their empoyees as if their kids....find which area's they are weak at and offer them trainings..it will make them feel that the employer is not only thinking about thier own growth and benefit but also is interested in investing effort in upgrading them and helping them grow professionally. I really like the model in which lot of empoyers sponser the higher education and certifications for their employees. Trust me ! its a great motivator !! |
|
27 posts back to top |
| Posted 8 months ago With all due respect for those talking about the great theories of motivation, I think they are good as theories only. Nowadays is "Show me the money!!!" plus the extra benefits. My opinion.
|
|
2 posts back to top |
| Posted 8 months ago sanorita says ...
|




